Skip to content

Learn · read a page at a time

Page 18 of 21

Chapter 10 · Rights at the Schoolhouse Gate

Page 1 of 1 in this chapter

From the page before

Which body kept its removal protections that same day?

The answer: The Federal Reserve

Why: Trump v. Cook, 5 to 4, pointed to a long habit of keeping money policy out of politics. It said any change must come from Congress, not the courts.

Rights at the schoolhouse gate

Four cases decide most of what a student may do at school — and what a school may do to a student. Learn the four and you know where you stand.

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). Students wore black armbands to class to protest a war. The school banned them. The Court sided with the students: you do not shed your rights at the schoolhouse gate. A school may stop student speech only when it truly disrupts the work of the class — not because the topic is unwelcome.

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988). A principal cut two pages from the school paper. The Court allowed it. The paper was made in a class, with the school's name on it. So the school could control what it printed, for real teaching reasons. Your own speech is Tinker. The school's own paper is Hazelwood.

New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985). A vice principal searched a student's purse. No warrant. The Court allowed it. School staff do not need the police's high bar, called 'probable cause'. They need a lower one, called 'reasonable suspicion' — a real reason to think a school rule or a law was broken. The search must still fit that reason. Staff cannot search everything because they may search something.

Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995). A school made its athletes take random drug tests. The Court allowed that too. Athletes chose to join the team, share locker rooms, and follow team rules, so their claim to privacy at school was weaker — and the school was answering a real drug problem.

The gate swings both ways. You keep your rights at school. And the school keeps powers over you that a police officer on the street would not have.

Before you turn the page

A student is told to remove a protest button because 'someone might complain.' Which case controls?

  1. Tinker v. Des Moines
  2. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
  3. New Jersey v. T.L.O.
  4. Vernonia School District v. Acton

A principal pulls a story from the class-produced school paper for a stated teaching reason. Which case says the school may?

  1. Tinker v. Des Moines
  2. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
  3. Texas v. Johnson
  4. Marbury v. Madison

What must school staff have before searching a student's bag?

  1. A warrant
  2. 'Probable cause', like the police
  3. 'Reasonable suspicion' — a real reason tied to a rule or law
  4. Nothing at all

Why did the drug tests in Vernonia survive?

  1. Every student can always be tested
  2. Athletes chose the team, shared locker rooms, and the school had a documented drug problem
  3. Schools may never test anyone
  4. The tests were voluntary

Trying to recall a thing before you read it again is what makes it stick. That is why the question is here.

Nothing is scored. Nothing is saved. No one sees your answer, and there is no account to make.